Sources of inefficiency in the procurement of major weapon systems. Estimates for the German case


  • Michael Brzoska University of Hamburg



Arms procurement, procurement inefficiency, Germany


The objective of this article is to provide a rough estimate of inefficiencies in German major weapons procurement. It is possible to derive estimates of procurement inefficiencies for 2022 programs—arising from a failure to exploit economies of scale, the complexity of co-production projects, cost overruns and time delays, and low weapon utilization rates. As the necessary data is only partly available to the public, these estimates rely on several assumptions and so are presented as ranges. This article identifies two main causes of symptoms of inefficiency in German major weapons procurement: (a) technological requirements beyond the reach of arms producers at the time decisions on procurements were made, and (b) protectionism, i.e. the favoring of national arms producers. Overall, it is estimated that German taxpayers could have been spared a least a third of total procurement costs had these inefficiencies been avoided.


Arepally, S. 2017. Riding the Experience Curve, Army AL&T Magazine, July-September, pp. 19–24.

Ballester, B. 2013. The Cost of Non-Europe in Common Security and Defence Policy. Available at: (Accessed: 10 March 2024).

BMVg (2018-2021). 8.–14. Bericht des Bundesministeriums der Verteidigung zu Rüstungsangelegenheiten. Available at: (Accessed: 10 March 2024).

BMVg (2017a, 2019-2021a). Bericht zur materiellen Einsatzbereitschaft der Hauptwaffensysteme. Available at: (Accessed: 10 March 2024).

Briani, V. 2013. The Costs of non-Europe in the Defence Field. Roma: Instituto Affari Internazionali.

Brzoska, M. 2019. Germany. The Economics of the Global Defence Industry. London: Routledge, pp. 194–214.

Brzoska, M. 2022. It's not the money, stupid! Die Hauptprobleme im Beschaffungswesen der Bundeswehr. Hamburg: Greenpeace Germany.

Bundesregierung 2020. Strategiepapier der Bundesregierung zur Stärkung der Sicherheits- und Verteidigungsindustrie. Available at: (Accessed: 3 October 2023).

Essig, M., A. H. Glas und S. Mondry. 2016. A Cost Increase Analysis of Weapon Systems Using the Paasche Index: Cases from the German Bundeswehr. Journal of Military Studies, 3(1), pp. 1–30.

ESUT (2023). German Tiger Attack Helicopters Are Not To Be Modernized. Available at: (Accessed: 3 October 2023).

European Commission (2013). Commission Communication on ‘Towards a More Competitive and Efficient Defence and Security Sector. Available at: (Accessed: 10 March 2024).

European Commission (2017). Defending Europe. The Case for Greater EU Cooperation on Security and Defence. Available at: (Accessed: 3 October 2023).

Ford, R. 2015. Understanding the cost of cooperation. Available at: (accessed: 10 March 2024).

Hartley. K. 2008. Collaboration and European Defence Industrial Policy. Defence and Peace Economics, 19(4), pp. 303–315.

Hartley, K. 2013. The Economics of Smart Defense. Connections, 12(3), pp. 1–8.

Hartley, K. 2016. The Economics of European Defence. Available at: (Accessed: 10 March 2024).

Hartley. K. 2020. Rising Costs: Augustine Revisited. Defence and Peace Economics, 31(4), pp. 434–442.

Hartley, K and D. Braddon. 2014. Collaborative projects and the number of partner nations. Defence and Peace Economics, 25(5), pp. 535–548.

Hogan, D. W. 2020. An Analysis of Learning Curve Theory and Diminishing Rates of Learning. Available at: (Accessed: 3 October 2023).

Küchle, H. 2006. The cost of non-Europe in the area of security and defence. Available at: (Accessed: 3 October 2023).

NATO (2015). Cost Efficiency Implications of International Cooperation. Available at:$$TR-SAS-090-ALL (Accessed: 3 October 2023).



How to Cite

Brzoska, M. (2024). Sources of inefficiency in the procurement of major weapon systems. Estimates for the German case. The Economics of Peace and Security Journal, 19(1).




Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.