Belgian military spending: A narrative of decline, stagnation, and recent reversal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15355/epsj.21.1.5Keywords:
Defence spending, burden sharing, NATOAbstract
The trajectory of Belgian defence spending from the end of the Cold War in 1990 to the present day is a compelling case study of how a small, highly globalized nation navigates its defence policy in response to shifting economic, security, and political landscapes. In this article we provide both a historical overview of Belgian defence spending after the Cold War and a comparison with other countries. It is a narrative of decline, stagnation, and a recent dramatic reversal. The period from 1990 to 2014 was defined by the economic imperative of fiscal austerity, which allowed governments to utilize the "peace dividend" to divert resources from defence to other government spending. This trajectory was altered by the geopolitical realities of 2014 and, most notably, 2022. Russia's invasion of Ukraine served as the catalyst that realigned the three key determinants, i.e., economic, political, and security, in favour of increased military expenditure. Moreover, Belgium not only increased military spending quantitatively but also qualitatively reaching NATO’s 20% major equipment and associated research and development investment benchmark.
Keywords: Defence spending, burden sharing, NATO
References
Banerjee, A., Karavia, Y. and Wang, L., 2023. The impact of military spending on economic growth: A threshold regression analysis. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, MPRA Paper No. 124684.
Becker, J., 2021. ‘Rusty guns and buttery soldiers: Unemployment and the domestic origins of defense spending’, European Political Science Review, 13(3), pp. 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773921000102
Bel, G. and Elias Moreno, F., 2009. Institutional determinants of military spending. Research Institute of Applied Economics Working Papers, No. 22.
Belgian Federal Government, 2026. Belgium, a federal state. Available at: https://www.belgium.be/en/about_belgium/government/federale_staat (Accessed: 1 April 2026).
Blum, J. and Potrafke, N., 2020. ‘Does a change of government influence compliance with international agreements? Empirical evidence for the NATO two percent target’, Defence and Peace Economics, 31(7), pp. 743–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2019.1575141
Bove, V. and Brauner, J., 2016. ‘The demand for military expenditure in authoritarian regimes’, Defence and Peace Economics, 27(5), pp. 609–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2014.925325
Buts, C., Du Bois, C. and Raes, S., 2017. ‘Political cycles in military deployment’, Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 23(4), pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2017-0025
Chinn, D., Dimson, J., Lambert, J. and Chapman, T., 2025. A different lens on Europe’s defense budgets. McKinsey & Company.
Christie, E.H., 2017. ‘The demand for military expenditure in Europe: The role of fiscal space in the context of a resurgent Russia’, Defence and Peace Economics, 30(1), pp. 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2017.1373542
Christie, E.H., Buts, C. and Du Bois, C., 2023. ‘Demand for military expenditures and security alignment choices in the Indo Pacific’, Defence and Peace Economics, 34(5), pp. 581–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2022.2073430
Collier, P. and Hoeffler, A., 2002. Military expenditures: Threats, aid, and arms races. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep02498.pdf (Accessed: 1 April 2026). https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2927
Defensie, 2021. Update of the Strategic Vision 2030: Recommendations. Available at: https://www.defence-institute.be/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/200622-Strategic-Vision-2021-EN.pdf (Accessed: 1 April 2026).
Defensie, 2025. Strategische visie defensie 2025. Available at: https://www.mil.be/media/ulunodln/strategische-visie-2025-integraal.pdf (Accessed: 1 April 2026).
Droff, J. and Malizard, J., 2022. ‘Determinants of defense spending: The role of strategic factors in France’, Defence and Peace Economics, 33(8), pp. 938–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2021.1907985
Dunne, J.P. and Perlo Freeman, S., 2003. ‘The demand for military spending in developing countries: A dynamic panel analysis’, Defence and Peace Economics, 14(6), pp. 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/1024269032000085224
Dunne, J.P. and Tian, N., 2013. ‘Military expenditure and economic growth: A survey’, Economics of Peace and Security Journal, 8(1), pp. 5–11. https://doi.org/10.15355/epsj.8.1.5
Eichenberg, R.C. and Stoll, R., 2003. ‘Representing defense: Democratic control of the defense budget in the United States and Western Europe’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47(4), pp. 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002703254477
European Commission, 2026. ‘Commission approves first wave of defence funding for eight Member States under SAFE’, Directorate General for Defence Industry and Space, 15 January.
European Defence Agency (EDA), 2025. EDA defence data 2024–2025. Available at: https://eda.europa.eu/publications-and-data/thematic-policy-reports/eda-defence-data-2024-2025 (Accessed: 1 April 2026).
Eurostat, 2025. Euro area and EU government deficit at 3.1% of GDP. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-euro-indicators (Accessed: 1 April 2026).
Haesebrouck, T., 2024. ‘EU member state support to Ukraine’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orae005
International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2025. Belgium: 2025 Article IV consultation. Available at: https://www.elibrary.imf.org (Accessed: 1 April 2026). https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229005180.002
Kollias, C. and Makrydakis, S., 2000. ‘Tax and spend or spend and tax?’, Applied Economics, 32(5), pp. 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368400322444
Ministère des Armées et des Anciens Combattants, 2022. CaMo: Une coopération européenne inédite entre la France et la Belgique. Available at: https://www.defense.gouv.fr (Accessed: 1 April 2026).
NATO, 2018. NATO Baltic Air Policing: Belgium to take over lead. Available at: https://ac.nato.int (Accessed: 1 April 2026).
NATO, 2022. Belgium sends reinforcements to NATO’s eastern flank. Available at: https://shape.nato.int (Accessed: 1 April 2026).
NATO, 2025. Defence expenditure of NATO countries. Available at: https://www.nato.int (Accessed: 1 April 2026).
NATO, 2026. Funding NATO. Available at: https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/introduction-to-nato/funding-nato (Accessed: 11 April 2026).
Nikolaidou, E., 2008. ‘The demand for military expenditure: Evidence from the EU 15’, Defence and Peace Economics, 19(4), pp. 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242690802166533
Odehnal, J. and Neubauer, J., 2020. ‘Economic, security, and political determinants of military spending in NATO countries’, Defence and Peace Economics, 31(5), pp. 517–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2018.1544440
Potrafke, N., 2011. ‘Does government ideology influence budget composition?’, Economics of Governance, 12, pp. 101–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-010-0092-9
Rosh, R.M., 1988. ‘Third world militarization: Security webs and the states they ensnare’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32(4), pp. 671–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002788032004004
Sezgin, S. and Yildirim, J., 2002. ‘The demand for Turkish defence expenditure’, Defence and Peace Economics, 13(2), pp. 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242690210973
Thies, W.J., 2003. Friendly rivals: Bargaining and burden shifting in NATO. London: Routledge.
Walgrave, S. and Lefevere, J., 2024. De stemming 2024. Antwerpen: Universiteit Antwerpen.
Walsh, B., Isomitdinov, H. and Lee, J., 2024. ‘Military spending and the fear hypothesis’, Defence and Peace Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2024.2443909
Whitten, G.D. and Williams, L.K., 2011. ‘Buttery guns and welfare hawks’, American Journal of Political Science, 55(1), pp. 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00479.x
Xia, M.E., 2025. Belgium in Contemporary Uncertainty: The War in Ukraine and the Return of National Interest. Europe. Russie. Débat, 1, p.1.
