The Assassin and the Donor as third players in the traditional deterrence game

Authors

  • Lisa J. Carlson
  • Raymond Dacey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15355/epsj.4.2.15

Keywords:

Deterrence game, game theory, third-party player

Abstract

We develop two extensions of the traditional deterrence game to examine the influence of third players, called Assassin and Donor, upon the behavior of a Challenger. The results present the optimal behavior of Challenger when Assassin and Donor are included in the traditional deterrence game. The key result is that Challengers who back down, and thereby activate Assassin or Donor, are more prone to initiate conflict in the first place than are Challengers who escalate, and thereby avoid Assassin or Donor.

References

Bahgat, G. 2005. “Nonproliferation Success.” World Affairs. Vol. 168, pp. 3-12.

Bueno de Mesquita, B. 2006. Principles of International Politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.

Hatina, M. 2005. “Theology and Power in the Middle East: Palestinian Martyrdom in Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Political Ideologies. Vol. 10, pp. 241-267.

Heikal, M. 1983. Autumn of Fury: The Assassination of Sadat. New York: Random House.

Morrow, J.D. 1994. Game Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Öberg, M., F. Möller, and P. Wallensteen. 2008. “Early Conflict Prevention in Ethnic Crises, 1990-98: A New Dataset.” Working paper. Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University.

Peri, Y. 2000. The Assassination of Yitzhak Rabin. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Sasson, T. and S. Kelner. 2008. “From Shrine to Forum: Masada and the Politics of Jewish Extremism.” Israel Studies. Vol. 13, pp. 146-163.

Zagare, F.C. and D.M. Kilgour. 1993. “Asymmetric Deterrence.” International Studies Quarterly. Vol. 37, pp. 1-27.

Zagare, F.C. and D.M. Kilgour. 2000. Perfect Deterrence. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Zagare, F.C. and D.M. Kilgour. 2003. “Alignment Patterns, Crisis Bargaining, and Extended Deterrence: A Game-Theoretic Analysis.” International Studies Quarterly. Vol. 47, pp. 587-615.

Downloads

Published

2009-07-06

How to Cite

Carlson, L. J., & Dacey, R. (2009). The Assassin and the Donor as third players in the traditional deterrence game. The Economics of Peace and Security Journal, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.15355/epsj.4.2.15

Issue

Section

Articles