Trade and conflict: The dyad of Greece and Turkey

Archontis L. Pantsios

Abstract


The conflict-trade paradigm has been dominated by the liberal and realist schools of thought, which try to explain how and why trade affects conflict and cooperation. While the liberal point of view predicts a positive effect of levels of trade on cooperation, realists counter by arguing a negative or negligible effect at best. The article presents the basic theoretical arguments and extensions of the conflict-trade relation as espoused by the liberal school of thought and applies them to the Greco- Turkish dyad. Foreign policy conclusions are drawn from a Greek point of view, and are related to trade volume, type of trade, state of democratization, country size, contiguity, tariffs, foreign aid, and third-party effects. With few qualifications, it is shown that it would serve Greece's best interests and promote peace in the region if Turkey were to become a full member of the European Union.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alesina A. and E. Spolaore. 2003. The Size of Nations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Ashley, R. 1980. The Political Economy of War and Peace: The Sino-Soviet-American Triangle and the Modern Security Problematique. London: Frances Pinter.

Barbieri, K. 1996. “Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source Interstate Conflict?” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 33, pp. 29-50.

Cashel-Cordo, P. and S.G. Craig. 1997. “Donor Preferences and Recipient Fiscal Behavior: A Simultaneous Analysis of Foreign Aid.” Economic Inquiry, Vol. 35, pp. 653-671.

Chan, S. 1984. “Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, are the Freer Countries More Pacific?” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 28, pp. 617-648.

Diehl, P.F. 1985. “Contiguity and Military Escalation in Major Rivalries,1816-1980.” Journal of Politics, Vol. 47, pp. 1203-1211.

Domke, W.K. 1988. War and the Changing Global System. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Ethier, W. and A. Ray. 1979. “Gains From Trade and the Size of a Country.” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 9, pp. 127-129.

Feng, Y. 1994. “Trade, Conflict, and Alliances.” Defence and Peace Economics, Vol. 5, pp. 301-313.

Gasiorowski, M.J. 1986. “Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: Some Cross-National Evidence.” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 30, pp. 23-38.

Gowa, J. 1994. Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Grieco, J.M. 1988. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism.” International Organization, Vol. 42, pp. 485-529.

Mansfield, E.D. 1994. Power, Trade, and War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Mastanduno, M. 1991. “Do Relative Gains Matter? America’s Response To Japanese Industrial Policy.” International Security, Vol. 16, pp. 73-113.

Morrow, J.D., R.D. Siverson, and T.E.Tabares. 1998. “The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers 1907-1990.” American Political Science Review, Vol. 92, pp. 649-661.

Oneal, J.R. and B. Russett. 1997. “The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Inderdependence , and Conflict, 1950-1985.” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 41, pp. 267-294.

Orr, R.M. 1989/1990. “Collaboration or Conflict? Foreign Aid and U.S.-Japan Relations.” Pacific Affairs, Vol. 62, pp. 476-489.

Pantsios, A. and S.W. Polachek. 2002. “How Asymmetrically Increasing Joint Strike Costs Need Not Lead to Fewer Strikes.” Department of Economics. Working Paper, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York.

Polachek, S.W. 1980. “Conflict and Trade.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 24, pp. 55-78.

Polachek, S.W. 1992. “Conflict and Trade: An Economics Approach to Political International Interactions,” W. Isard and C. Anderton, eds. Economics of Arms Reduction. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Polachek, S.W. 1997. “Why Democracies Cooperate More and Fight Less: The Relationship Between International Trade and Cooperation.” Review of International Economics, Vol. 5, pp. 295-309.

Polachek, S.W. and C. Seiglie. 2006. “Trade, Peace, and Democracy: An Analysis of Dyadic Dispute.” Department of Economics. Working Paper. Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York.

Polachek, S.W. and C. Seiglie. 2007. “Trade, Peace, and Democracy: An Analysis of Dyadic Dispute,” pp. 1017-1073 in T. Sandler and K. Hartley, eds. Handbook of Defense Economics. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Polachek, S.W., C. Sieglie, and J. Xiang. 2005. “Globalization and International Conflict: Can FDI Increase Peace?” Department of Economics. Working Paper. Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey.

Polachek, S.W. and J.A. McDonald. 1992. “Strategic Trade and the Incentive For Cooperation,” pp. 273-284 in M. Chatterji and L. Forcey, eds. Disarmament, Economic Conversion and Management of Peace. New York: Praeger.

Polachek, S.W., J. Robst, and Y.C. Chang. 1999. “Liberalism and Interdependence: Extending the Trade-Conflict Model.” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 36, pp. 405-422.

Reuveny, R. 1999. “The Trade and Conflict Debate: A Survey of Theory, Evidence and Future Research.” Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, Vol. 6, pp. 23-49.

Reuveny, R. and H. Kang. 1996. “International Trade, Political Conflict/Cooperation, and Granger Causality.” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 40, pp. 943-70.

Reuveny, R. and H. Kang. 1998. “Bilateral Trade and Political Conflict/Cooperation: Do Goods Matter?” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 35, pp. 581-602.

Sayrs, L. 1989. “Trade and Conflict Revisited: Do Politics Matter?” International Interaction, Vol. 14, pp. 155-175.

Thompson, P.G. 2003. “Foreign Direct Investment and War: Economic Deterrence to Armed Conflict.” Ph.D. Dissertation. Los Angeles, CA: University of Los Angeles.

Tsiordas, D. 2006. “Business that Brings Us Closer.” KYRIAKATIKH ELEYTHEROTYPIA [Greek Sunday Newspaper]. 21 May 2006.

Vincent, J. 1987. “On Rummel’s Omnipresent Theory.” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 31, pp. 119-126.

Vousden, N. 1990. The Economics of Trade Protection. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Vries, M. 1990. “Interdependence, Cooperation and Conflict: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 27, pp. 429-444.

Weede, E. 1984. “Democracy and War Involvement.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 28, pp. 56-69.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15355/epsj.2.2.81

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.