Gender, poverty, and domestic violence in rural Bengal: The Jeevika Development Society’s journey through women’s rights-based microcredit programs


  • Nilanjana Sengupta Assistant Professor, School of Women’s Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
  • Dolon Ganguly Executive Director, Jeevika Development Society, West Bengal, India



To understand the nature of the links among gender, poverty, and violence in specific sociocultural contexts, this article unravels a complex web of interactions among the Jeevika Development Society, the communities in which its members live, and women’s individual initiatives. It also examines the process by which ruptures are made in these links through women’s active participation in the Society. The article asks whether economic outcomes facilitated by the organization have any impact, or are impacted upon, by gender relations at home, which manifest themselves through different forms of violence. It further explores whether dimensions of participation that are more social than economic, such as voluntary work with anti-violence forums as well as positions of leadership in the Society, create possibilities of empowerment that are stronger and more direct than the possibilities that may emerge through economic gains alone.


Armendariz, B. and J. Morduch. 2007. The Economics of Microfinance. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Banerjee, N. 1997. “How Real is the Bogey of Feminization?” The Indian Journal of Labour Economics. Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 427-438.

Brym, R.J., S. Chung, S. Dulmage, C. Farahat, M. Greenberg, and M. Ho. 2005. “In Faint Praise of the World Bank’s Gender Development Policy.” Canadian Journal of Sociology. Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 95-111.

Buvinic, M. 1983. Women’s Issues in Third World Poverty: A Policy Analysis. Women and Poverty in the Third World. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.

Cagatay, N. 1998. “Gender and Poverty.” Working Paper No. 5. United Nations Development Programme.

Chandrasekhar, C.P. and J. Ghosh. 2002. The Market That Failed: Neoliberal Economic Reforms in India. Left Word Books, New Delhi.

Chant, S.H. 2006. “Re-thinking the ‘Feminization of Poverty’ in Relation to Aggregate Gender Indices.” Journal of Human Development. Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 201-220.

Cull, R., A.D. Kunt, and J. Morduch. 2008. “Microfinance Meets the Market. The Financial Access Initiative.” Retrieved from [accessed on 20 December 2010].

Goetz, A.M. and R. Sengupta. 1996. “Who takes the Credit? Gender, Power and Control over Loan Use in Rural Credit Programs in Bangladesh.” World Development. Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 45-63.

Hashemi, S.M., R.S. Schuler, and A.P. Riley. 1996. “Rural Credit Programs and Women’s Empowerment in Bangladesh.” World Development. Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 635-653.

Hayward, C.R. 1998. “De-facing Power.” Polity. Vol. 31, pp. 22-34.

Hulme, D. and P. Mosley. 1996. Finance Against Poverty. London: Routledge.

Jitha, T.J. 2013. “Mediating Production, Re-powering Patriarchy: The Case of Micro Credit.” Indian Journal of Gender Studies. Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. .253-278.

John, M.E. 1996. “Gender and Development in India, 1970s-1990s: Some Reflections on the Constitutive Rroles of Contexts.” Economic and Political Weekly. Vol. 31, No. 47, pp. 3071-3077.

Kabeer, N. 2005. “Is Microfinance a Magic Bullet for Women’s Empowerment? Analysis of Findings from South Asia.” Economic and Political Weekly. Vol. 40, No.s 44 & 45, pp. 4709-4718.

Khandker, S.R. 2005. “Microfinance and Poverty: Evidence Using Panel Data from Bangladesh.” The World Bank Economic Review. Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 263-286.

Mosedale, S. 2005. “Policy Arena. Assessing Women’s Empowerment: Towards a Conceptual Framework.” Journal of International Development. Vol. 17, pp. 243-257.

Moser, C.O.N. 1989. “Gender Planning in the Third World: Meeting Practical and Strategic Gender Needs.” World Development. Vol. 17, No. 11, pp. 1799-1825.

Mukherjee, M. 2004. “ Women and Work in the Shadow of Globalization.” Indian Journal of Gender Studies. Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 275-290.

Patnaik, P. 2006. “The Meaning of Contemporary Globalization,” in M.E. John, P.K. Jha, and S.S. Jodhka, eds. Contested Transformations: Changing Economies and Identities in Contemporary India. Tulika Books: New Delhi.

Rahman, A. 1999. “Micro-credit Initiatives for Equitable and Sustainable Development: Who Pays?” World Development. Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 67-82.

Rogaly, B. 1996. “Micro-finance Evangelism, “Destitute Women,”, and the Hard Selling of a New Anti-poverty Formula.” Development in Practice. Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 100-112.

Sengupta, N. 2013. “Poor Women’s Empowerment: The Discursive Space of Microfinance.” Indian Journal of Gender Studies. Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 279-304.

Standing, G. 1999. “Global Feminization through Flexible Labor: A Theme Revisited.” World Development. Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 583-602.




How to Cite

Sengupta, N., & Ganguly, D. (2014). Gender, poverty, and domestic violence in rural Bengal: The Jeevika Development Society’s journey through women’s rights-based microcredit programs. The Economics of Peace and Security Journal, 9(1).