Trade, openness, and domestic conflict: An empirical investigation for Latin America

Prasad S. Bhattacharya, Dimitrios D. Thomakos

Abstract


The article reports results of an empirical investigation into trade, openness, and domestic conflict for several Latin American countries. It addresses two main issues: (1) whether variations in trade openness affect the likelihood of the onset of domestic conflict and (2) once initiated, how variations in openness affect conflict duration. For the period 1973- 1995, and controlling for numerous sociopolitical, institutional, and economic factors, our findings suggest that (1) increased trade openness reduces the chance for domestic conflict onset as well as the intensity of domestic conflict and (2) over-reliance on agricultural exports, which can be a consequence of increased openness, is the main factor sustaining conflict. Conflict mitigation policies should keep in mind the role tradable agricultural goods play in this region of the world.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Collier, P. and A. Hoeffler. 1998. “On the Economic Causes of Civil War.” Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 50, pp. 563-573.

Collier, P. and A. Hoeffler. 2004. “Greed and Grievance in Civil War.” Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 56, pp. 563-595.

Collier, P., A. Hoeffler, and M. Soderbom. 2004. “On the Duration of Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 41, pp. 253-273.

Fearon, J. D. and D. D. Laitin. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency and Civil War.” American Political Science Review, Vol. 97, pp. 75-90.

Fraga, Arminio. 2004. “Latin America Since the 1990s: Rising from the Sickbed.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 18, pp. 89-106.

Garfinkel, M., S. Skaperdas, and C. Syropoulos. “Globalization and Domestic Conflict.” Working Paper no. 0507005, Internet Documents in Economics Access Service (IDEAS), July 2005; Research Papers in Economics (RePEc) Downloadable from http://www.socsci.uci.edu/~sskaperd/gss3-apr06.pdf or from http://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpit/0507005.html.

Gleditsch, N. P., P. Wallensteen, M. Eriksson, M. Sollenberg, and H. Strand, 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset,” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 39, pp. 615-637.

Hegre, H. 2002. “Some Social Requisites of a Democratic Civil Peace: Democracy, Development, and Armed Conflict.” Paper presented to the American Political Science Association 2002 Annual Meeting. Boston, MA.

La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer. and R. Vishny. 1998. “The Quality of Government.” National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 6727. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

Lipton, M., R. Eastwood, and J. Kirsten. 2002. “Land and Asset Size, Structure and Distribution and the Links to Income in Three Drylands.” Poverty Research Unit. Working Paper. University of Sussex, U.K. (February).

Ross, M. 2004. “What Do We Know About Natural Resources and Civil War?” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 41, pp. 337-356.

Ocampo, J.A. 2004. “Latin America’s Growth and Equity Frustrations During Structural Reforms.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 18, pp. 67-88.

Sambanis, N. 2004. “Using Case Studies to Expand Economic Models of Civil War.” Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 2, pp. 259-279.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15355/epsj.2.2.77

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.