Crime and social conflict in India

Sofia Amaral, Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay, Samrat Bhattacharya, Rudra Sensarma

Abstract


This article has two goals. First, using district-level panel data we identify key determinants of violent crime, nonviolent crime, and crime against women in India, 1990-2007. Second, using district-level variation in regard to Maoist-driven social conflict, we examine how social conflict affects crime and its determinants. In addition to conventional determinants of crime (e.g., law enforcement and economic variables), we examine how variation in sex ratios affects crime. We also study whether the gender of the chief political decisionmaker in each state affects crime. We find that improvements in arrest rates decreases the incidence of all types of crimes. Socioeconomic variables have relatively little explanatory power. We also find evidence that unbalanced sex ratios, particularly in rural areas, increase crime. The presence of a female Chief Minister diminishes violent crime and, especially, crimes against women. Finally, we find that in districts affected by the Maoist insurgency, all types of crime are lower and we offer explanations for why that may be the case.

Full Text:

 Subscribers Only

References


Bandyopadhyay, S. 2011. “Rich States, Poor States: Convergence and Polarisation Across Indian States.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 414-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.2011.00553.x

Becker, G.S. 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 169-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/259394

Bennett, S, D. Farrington, and L. Rowell Huesmann. 2004. “Explaining Gender Differences in Crime and Violence: The Importance of Social Cognitive Skills.” Aggression and Violent Behavior. Vol. 10, pp. 263-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2004.07.001

Bholken, A., T. Sergenti, and E. John. 2010. “Economic Growth and Ethnic Violence: An Empirical Investigation of Hindu-Muslim Riots in India.” Journal of Peace Research. Vol. 47 No. 5, pp. 589-600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022343310373032

Borooah, V. 2008. “Deprivation, Violence and Conflict: An Analysis of Naxalite Activity in the Districts of India.” International Journal of Conflict and Violence. Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 317-333.

Demombynes, G. and B. Ozler. 2005. “Crime and Local Inequality in South Africa.” Journal of Development Economics. Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 265-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.12.015

Dutta, M. and Z. Husain. 2009. “Crime, Deterrence and Growth in Post-liberalised India.” MPRA Archive Paper 14478. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/14478/.

Edlund, L., H. Li, J. Yi, and J. Zhang. 2013. “Sex Ratios and Crime: Evidence from China.” Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 95, No. 5, pp. 1520-1534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00356

Eynde, O. 2013. “Targets of Violence: Evidence from India’s Naxalite Conflict.” Mimeo. http://dial2013.dauphine.fr/fileadmin/mediatheque/dial2013/documents/Papers/301_France_VandenEynde.pdf.

[GOI]. Government of India. 2004. “Revised Guidelines for Reimbursement of Security Related Expenditure to Naxal-affected States under the SRE Scheme.” Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs.

Gomes, J. 2012. “The Political Economy of the Maoist Conflict in India: An Empirical Analysis.” Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Working Paper 12-18. http://orff.uc3m.es/handle/10016/14583.

Hoelscher, K., J. Miklian, and K. Vadlamannati. 2013. “Hearts and Mines: A District-level Analysis of the Maoist Conflict in India.” International Area Studies Review. Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 141-160.

[HRW] Human Rights Watch. 2008. “Being Neutral is Our Biggest Crime: Government, Vigilante, and Naxalite Abuses in India’s Chhattisgarh State.” http://www.hrw.org/reports/2008/india0708/india0708web.pdf.

Iyer, L. 2009. “The Bloody Millennium: Internal Conflict in South Asia.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School. Working Paper 09-086. http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/09-086.pdf.

Iyer, L., A. Mani, P. Mishra, and P. Topalova. 2012. “The Power of Political Voice: Women’s Political Representation and Crime in India.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 165-193.

Kapur, D., K. Gawande, and S. Satyanath. 2012. “Renewable Resource Shocks and Conflict in India’s Maoist Belt.” Center for Global Development. Working Paper. Washington, D.C.: Center for Global Development.

Kujur, R. 2008. “Naxal Movement in India: A Profile.” Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies Research Papers. Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies. New Delhi. http://www.ipcs.org/pdf_file/issue/848082154RP15-Kujur-Naxal.pdf.

Machin, S., O. Marie, and S. Vuji. 2011. “The Crime Reducing Effect of Education.” The Economic Journal. Vol. 121, No. 552, pp. 463-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02430.x

Miguel, E. and S. Satyanath. 2011. “Re-examining Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 228-232.

Prasad, K. 2013. “A Comparison of Victim-Reported and Police-Recorded Crime in India.” Economic and Political Weekly. Vol. 48, No. 33.

Ramaiah, A. 2011. “Growing Crimes Against Dalits in India Despite Special Laws: Relevance of Ambedkar’s Demand for ‘Separate settlement’.” Journal of Law and Conflict Resolution. Vol. 3, No. 9, pp. 151-168.

Singhal, N. and R. Nilakantan. 2012. “Naxalite Insurgency and the Economic Benefits of a Unique Robust Security Response.” Households in Conflict Network. Paper 127.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15355/epsj.9.1.46

Refbacks



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.