Home
Aims
Book Reviews
Editorial Board
Submissions
Subscriptions
Contact Us
Recent Issues
Vol 1, No 1
Vol 1, No 2
Vol 2, No 1
Vol 2, No 2
Vol 3, No 1
Vol 3, No 2
Renew
Subscription
eps journal
A publication by Economists for Peace and Security
The peaceful resolution of U.S.-Mexican transboundary
Alyssa M. Neir and Michael E. Campana.
Vol 2, No 2 - Symposia: Water, Trade, Insurgency, July 2007
'The peaceful resolution of U.S.-Mexican transboundary water disputes.' To deal with boundary and transboundary water issues along their border, the United States and Mexico established the International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC) in 1889. Initially dealing only with surface water flows, its flexibility permitted changes such that groundwater and water quality issues could be addressed. In 1994, the U.S., Mexico, and Canada adopted the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) primarily to facilitate trade, but which can govern water as an article of commerce. Both NAFTA and the IBWC have been instrumental in promoting peaceful solutions to water issues. The article examines three cases: (1) Mexico's protesting of a U.S. plan to line the All-American Canal on the Mexico-California; (2) the underdelivery of Mexican Rio Grande water to the U.S. state of Texas; and (3) the case of an aquifer entirely within Mexico whose supply is being stressed because of a shift in agricultural production prompted by NAFTA. The article concludes that both countries should: (1) develop a more formal system for groundwater issues and (2) exercise vigilance with respect to NAFTA's ability to treat water solely as an economic good.
You do not have access to the full text of this article. You may purchase the article (individual articles are priced at £3 each and will be emailed to you as a PDF file after payment is received.)
To purchase this article please click the purchase link shown.
Alternatively please subscribe to the journal.
Return to the contents page.
You are logged in as guest. Some issues may not be available.